Church

Institute for Communal Contemplation and Dialogue
Exercising Contemplative Power
Reflection – Church

April 2012

In 1946 Herman Hesse won the Nobel Peace Prize for literature for The Glass Bead Game (sometimes called Magister Ludi). The book is a fascinating tale of the complexity of modern day life. Projected into the 25th century it deals with recurring philosophical conflicts and tries to arrive at a synthesis and harmony between the opposites. It presents a paradoxical clash between preserving institutions and searching for meaning. In the story, in the attempts to preserve the structure of the game, the point of the game was lost.

Thinking of the state of the 21st century Church, somehow on some deeper level I’m taken back to the book though I read it so long ago. The parallel is apparent if not blatant. The role of any institution is to preserve itself. The essence of Catholicism is dynamic transformation. The two together place those of us who care in a paradoxical situation.

At every turn we are reminded that we are living in an age of radical transformation where the traditional ways are not sufficient and new ways are not clear. One author calls this an apocalyptic time, a time of great rifts. Such a time gives rise to doubt, dissatisfaction, uncertainty, even violence.

In present day Church issues and actions the dichotomy between the practices within the institution and the core teachings of the faith is what rings out, no matter the particular issue or action. Headlines are filled with the issues of sexual abuse, embezzlement, silencing, treatment of women, judgment of gays, visitations that seemed in reality closer to inquisitions, the contradictory dictate of self-excommunication, healthcare stances that beg for integrity, and on and on.

Everyone, clergy, church members, and those to whom we witness, are caught in the chaos. Like so much of the other forms of violence in the world we are sucked in. Do we stand in judgment of each other and try to fix the problem? Or does it call out in us a willingness to risk a stance of integrity which could lead to becoming a modern day living martyr? How many of us are among what the church calls “self-excommunicated?” How many have been in a position of being judged for our actions?

As Eckhart helps us to understand, the reality of God is paradoxical, and can only be grasped within the tension and clash of opposites. Such clashes between the institutional church and those trying to pay attention to the new that is being born are occurring daily. The major clash, showing itself in so many different issues, can be seen as between a duality approach and an evolving unitive consciousness.

There are so many ways of interpreting what is occurring: power struggles, ideological differences, male superiority, pressure from financially influential groups and organizations, etc. But those can be said to be surface issues. Each side (institutional church, membership) is caught up in chaos and hopefully is seeking the underlying order that is explicit in chaos theory.

So how do we approach the rift from a contemplative stance? To quote from the Occasional Papers of LCWR and turn it into a question, how do we “take in new information and create an openness for seeing ‘the new’ which God is doing(?) What does it take to live in a world (a church) where much of what seemed certain and secure is no longer such, and where divisions in ways of thinking and perceiving seem to be separating us?”

Ilia Delio tells us “the church continues to function as a medieval construct, marginal to a global, complex world.” Such an insight is reiterated by so many contemporary thinkers and writers. Many of us would say that’s a statement of the obvious. But what isn’t obvious is how to be present in the resulting chaos.

How do we bring our evolving understandings of Church and church together?

The role of the institution is to preserve itself, as was stated earlier. But what of the institution should be preserved? Is it the structure that remains patriarchal in model? Or is it the message and spirit which elicits dynamic transformation?

And what is the role of the individual, of the church community, who experience and recognize the movement of the Spirit as being in and among us. How do we reframe our experiences of Church? Can we understand and fully grasp our identity, as Ilia states, as “cooperative co-creators” in this Church and in this world?

Chaos theory tells us,

the flapping of a single butterfly’s wing today produces
a tiny change in the state of the atmosphere. Over a period
of time, what the atmosphere actually does diverges from
what it would have done.

Is our role, those of us who care, to be the butterflies in the Church and spur the evolution? Can we be satisfied with that? Is that how we understand exercising contemplative power?

Written by: Arlene Ashack, IBVM

© 2012 Institute for Communal Contemplation and Dialogue
Reprint with permission iccdinstitute@aol.com.

For further reading:

Illia Delio, The Emergent Christ, Orbis, 2011; Christ in Evolution, Orbis, 2008.

 

2 Comments

  1. On our March 12 Exercising Contemplative Power Group:

    The five of us on this call agreed that it is indeed an auspicious time to be in contemplative dialogue as the Vatican Conclave is in session.
    We are mindful of the polarization that we all experience in our church but are also encouraged by the role that we as women religious (and others) have had over the years to bring about a new awareness of the importance of collaboration. By our commitment to this, we can and do bring a sense of hope to our people.
    Our own compassion was expressed for the Cardinals who are caught up in the pageantry from the past that is promulgated even more by the media that adds to the polarization we feel as church. We are also mindful, though, of the importance of ritual and liturgy within our own communities and how this could be so much more than it is in church settings.
    We were especially impressed by one woman’s sharing: “ just say your truth until there is a way to reach out to others.” When we do this, instead of putting our energies into the anger and frustration that can easily take over, we can and do exercise contemplative power.
    Women Religious have shown over the years our ability and willingness to let go of our institutions and to lovingly forge ahead in other creative life-giving ways. We would hope that this would be an incentive for the institutional church.
    We continue to be in this polarized time together patiently living into the questions for the new order that is emerging.
    We are very grateful for the insights and sharing that took place, especially at this time of the Conclave.

    Reply
  2. March 21 Reflection Group-Church

    Our group of four summarized a high quality sharing with a call to be non-judgmental, following the Sunday gospel of the woman taken in adultery. The other side of such a stance of suspended judgment is compassion. Jesus knew the feeling of being set up and trapped, so he could empathize with the woman, while pointing her in another direction.

    With respect to the new pope, Francis I, we believe an attitude of patience will be helpful, giving him room to grow and change. In addition to his refreshing public image, his demonstrated commitment to the poor bodes well.

    We do not wish to diminish God by underestimating the work of the Spirit in individuals or groups. Knowing that there will be resistance to changes, we promise to hold the Church in compassionate and contemplative prayer.

    Reply

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *